The time response of a system is how it performs in the time domain. We can often infer key characteristics of the system from the transfer function, especially its zeroes and poles.
Pole interpretations
In general, the transfer functions we’re interested in either have real poles (i.e., a real multiple of 1) or a pair of complex conjugate poles.
Real poles
For real poles for a function , the pole is at . Then:
- For , we have a unit step times a function.
- For , we have an exponentially decaying function.
- For , we have an exponentially growing function.
Complex poles
For complex conjugate poles in the form of , we define the natural frequency:
And the damping ratio:
The time domain expression for a second-order ODE gives us:
And a 2nd order transfer function is:
These parameters are fortunately very interpretable.
- : underdamped
- : critically damped
- : overdamped
The poles of the transfer function are also interpretable:
- For , we have a pair of complex conjugate poles with zeroed real parts. In this case, it just oscillates. Poles with a greater magnitude oscillate faster, i.e., poles further from the -axis.
- For a pair of poles in the RHP, we have an unstable system growing exponentially. If the imaginary part is zero, there’s no oscillatory part.
- For a pair of poles in the LHP, we have a stable system decaying exponentially. The further left the pole, the faster it decays.
This table shows the approximate time response given certain pole locations.1 Assume that if the imaginary part is non-zero that there’s a complex conjugate.
Footnotes
-
From Modern Control Systems, by Richard Dorf and Robert Bishop. ↩